Date: [INSERT
DATE]
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
To whom it may concern.
Dear Sir or Madam
I hope this letter and the accompanying notice finds you
well and leaves you better. You will find attached one Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right which
contains seven pages, in addition to this cover letter, which contains two
pages, (this and one other). I have crafted this Notice of Understanding and
Intent and Claim of Right for the purpose of avoiding future conflicts when I
begin exercising the rights claimed therein. It is my desire and intent to live
freely, peacefully, and within community standards, and do so in an orderly and
honourable manor, but without license, permission, restrictions or governance
from your organisations. I am not “anti-government” nor do I advocate lawless
behaviour, much to the contrary I wish to prove through my actions that good,
orderly, reasonable behaviour need not be mandated to exist. I think government
has its place in remedying conflict, and regulating those who wish to operate
in limited liability. I wish to operate in full liability and without
government interference. I do not wish to be a “thorn in your side” and I
intend to fulfil my duties to protect the freedom of speech by improving the
Internet and to use innovation, and creativity to make [INSERT
TOWN NAME WHERE YOU LIVE], The United Kingdom, and the world at large a nicer place
to live; needless to say if you are not bothering me I will have no time to
bother you.
If you are bureaucratic in nature, these ideas may come as
a bit of a surprise, but I think that with some observation, you will find that
all of the creative energy that shapes our world comes from people who choose
to act differently from their neighbours, and everyone who hasn't read all of the
“bodies-of-words” that may have authority over them, lives in fear of being
tried for violating something which they don't understand, and only does things
that have already been done and proven “safe” with the government. Thus, the
creativity of the people, and the productivity of a country, can be subverted
by its government holding the people accountable for too much “law”.
Before literacy was widespread, law was written down, but
the few who could read could interpret it however they pleased, or even make it
up when telling the law to the illiterate. Literacy is a prized skill here
because we understand that without being able to read we are at the mercy of
those who can. Neither I, nor anyone I know, nor even anyone I have heard
about, has read every word in the law library. Are we returning to an age when
the majority is subjugated by the minority who understands the law?
Regardless of the overall trends, I have made a good-faith
effort to read, and understand every law that may pertain to me, and have found
this task to be beyond my abilities. I could not even find a map of which law
applies to whom. I found deceptive language in the form of words, which looked
like they meant one thing in context but, upon looking them up in a law
dictionary, I found they actually mean something completely different. I found
numerous references such as “has as much authority as a” which requires anyone
who wants to understand the law to constantly need to ask more questions,
amounting to “rabbit trails” of paperwork to follow in order to gain any
meaningful insight. I found the words in the law library to be vague and very
easy to construe in many different ways. I have a sound understanding of
computers, and software, and it is my understanding that if the papers in the
law library were software to run a programme, when taken as a whole, it would
cause the system to crash. If somebody purposely wrote vague statutes in order
that they would have multiple meanings, one or more of which would lead a
reasonable person to violate the de facto
Constitution the United Kingdom if acting as a public servant, then somebody
has committed fraud.
Whether or not fraud was committed, I cannot read,
understand, nor in good faith try to follow, all of the statutes, regulations,
orders, and other words that have been written without my consent.
The remedy I have found is to make known to the world my understanding
and intent, and claim the rights, which I believe to be mine. Any who disagree
have an opportunity to discuss and negotiate, but those who silently wait out
their opportunity and then take legal action once I begin exercising my rights
are acting like predators, lying in wait and maximising conflict - and they are
dishonouring my notice and dishonouring a main pillar of the Rule of Law, which
clearly states that “conflict is avoidable and undesirable”.
I hope this letter causes you to think deeply and I hope
you understand that your authority depends on the moral high ground, for your
own credibility, and that of your government as a whole.
Your legal-system was designed to destroy the lives of
those who make their living doing injury upon others, and rightly so, but if
you seek out peaceful claimers of rights, and persecute them, you will create a
political movement, and freedom should only be for those mature enough to
accept responsibilities. However, by agreeing to coexist peacefully, you may
preserve your authority, and colour of authority for a long time to come.
In closing, I bid you fare-thee-well and wish you all the
best in your endeavours. Without ill will, malice aforethought, frivolity or
vexation, but with the intent of avoiding future conflicts or disputes by
stating clearly my understanding and intentions, and by claiming my rights
before exercising them.
I hereby sign this document with the "symbol" I
have adopted below, to seal my present intention to authenticate this document.
Signed
and dated on this, the [DATE] day of May in the year of our Lord 2009.
Sign your name here in RED INK
_______________________________________________
Freeman-on-the-land
[FIRST NAME] of
the family of [FAMILY NAME]
P.S. If you are unfamiliar with the term “A
Freeman-on-the-land” it is a flesh and blood man and one of the people, who
operates with full responsibility, and has
not given, or has lawfully revoked, consent to be represented or governed and,
in any common law jurisdiction, a Freeman-on-the-land exists free of any
statutory restrictions, obligations, and limitations...
No comments:
Post a Comment