Friday 27 June 2014

Bradford Magistrate's Court Council Tax hearing - PROOF OF FRAUD!

ALL court hearings for 'Council Tax' are FRAUDULENT because they do NOT follow the correct legal procedures and are unable to produce ANY Liability Order!
Which means that the Magistrates in this video are operating in FRAUD, working for private-for-profit corporations and are therefore PROVEN CRIMINALS!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRIXEkB3xV4

These PROVEN CRIMINALS need to be informed that they are committing FRAUD and TREASON and their FRAUDULENT 'summons', 'warrants', and 'liability orders' are ALL FRAUD and have NO force in law!

Wednesday 25 June 2014

Bradford City Council - ANOTHER 'rotten borough'!

"There is no evidence that a liability order was issued on 19th March 2014 and it is believed that none exists. 
The two interested parties, Bradford Magistrates Court and Bradford City Council have been deemed to be in error in this matter."

https://app.box.com/s/2fo16bx5gm3zqt838zqc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrsdxFICdMY 

When challenged to produce a Liability Order both the court and council fail to do so. It can only mean that no such 'order' exists and the claim by Bradford City Council is FRAUDULENT. FRAUD is a serious CRIMINAL offence, which takes the matter from Civil into CRIMINAL! This situation is similar or the same in all the other councils around the country!
Time for folk of integrity in Bradford, and other council areas, to STOP PAYING Council Tax!

Saturday 14 June 2014

Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council - ANOTHER 'rotten borough'!

 "WIRRAL COUNCIL IS SEEKING PERMISSION TO APPEAL THAT A ROOM MEASURING 36.53 SQUARE FEET IS A BEDROOM.
  • Despite the fact that if this was a private property they would have prosecuted the landlord!
  • Despite the fact that the 1985 Housing Act says such a room cannot be a bedroom
  • Despite the fact that the Housing Act 2004 and accompanying guidance would not class this as a bedroom
  • Despite the fact that Wirral Council is Labour run
  • Despite the fact that the tenants MP is Frank Field – he whom every government defers to on welfare matters including Conservative governments
  • Despite the fact that less than a mile away it is Esther McVeys constituency
  • Despite the fact this 36.53 square feet room is “L-shaped” too!"

http://speye.wordpress.com/2014/05/31/wirral-mbc-the-most-shameful-bedroom-tax-council-and-its-labour-run/

Once again, proving that the Labour Party is deeply involved in the FRAUDULENT 'council tax' and the CORRUPT & CRIMINAL corporate government and their plan to impoverish vast numbers of people in Britain!

Birmingham City Council - ANOTHER 'rotten borough'!

Birmingham City Council appear to be claiming that their UNLAWFUL and ILLEGAL enforcement of CORRUPT corporate government policies is beyond their control. But the evidence of CRIMINAL and FRAUDULENT embezzlement of Public Funds for private profit and private pensions, vast expenses for executives, managers and other staff, enormous investment portfolios, huge interest payments on 'debts', the flogging-off of public assets and contracts, is VERY CLEAR!

http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/84000-birmingham-children-living-poverty-7235066

Birmingham City Council is managed by Capita, a multinational corporation that 'manages' (for profit)
"... the entire revenue collection process for the council - council tax and business rates."
  • IT infrastructure: desktops, networks, applications, servers, service management – all run by just 1100 professionals
  • contact centre: we took on the management of the council’s customer contact centre operations, dealing with over two million calls a year
  • education services: complete IT solutions for schools, youth centres, libraries, museums and arts centres –providing the necessary capacity for a city-wide community e-learning programme
  • revenue: we are now managing the entire revenue collection process for the council – council tax and business rates
  • business transformation: we’re collaborating with the council, providing support and advice for its business transformation programme.
  • - See more at: http://www.capita.co.uk/our-experience/case-studies/service-birmingham.aspx#sthash.7ixqVWdC.dpuf
    the entire revenue collection process for the council – council tax and business rates - See more at: http://www.capita.co.uk/our-experience/case-studies/service-birmingham.aspx#sthash.7ixqVWdC.dpuf
     
     
    the entire revenue collection process for the council – council tax and business rates - See more at: http://www.capita.co.uk/our-experience/case-studies/service-birmingham.aspx#sthash.7ixqVWdC.dpuf
    the entire revenue collection process for the council – council tax and business rates - See more at: http://www.capita.co.uk/our-experience/case-studies/service-birmingham.aspx#sthash.7ixqVWdC.dpuf
    http://www.capita.co.uk/our-experience/case-studies/service-birmingham.aspx
    And of course Capita manage TVL who collect revenue for BBC, a private-for-profit corporation that protected dangerous serial PAEDOPHILES (and worse!) who committed CRIMINAL ABUSE of hundreds of children!

    The council is withholding Public Funds from the inhabitants leading to widespread poverty. Those responsible are guilty of Misconduct in Public Office and Misappropriation of Public Funds, both serious CRIMINAL offences!

    Wednesday 11 June 2014

    Basic Income - a Human Right!

    The CORRUPT corporate councils are denying a basic income to millions of people and their families, by implementing and enforcing ILLEGAL 'corporate rules', AGAINST the Constitutional and Common Laws of Britain!
    As we know, the Local Government Act 1888 empowers councils to oppose central government:
    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/51-52/41/section/15/enacted
    Yet most councils are complying with the corporate central government even though they know that they are acting AGAINST the Constitutional Laws and Customs of Britain!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zru79jcVTt4

    When councils deny ANY of their county inhabitants the basic income necessary to live in good health and security, THEY are acting AGAINST Basic Human Rights! Their job is to SERVE the inhabitants NOT penalise them on behalf of (PROVEN CORRUPT) central government. These ILLEGAL acts make councils complicit in CRIME and signify that ALL inhabitants should be withholding ALL local rates and taxes until the county councils UPHOLD THE LAW! Not only that, but, council officials are committing the serious CRIMINAL offence of Misconduct in Public Office, an offence that makes them liable for dismissal, hefty fines AND imprisonment!

    Tuesday 10 June 2014

    FRAUD in the courts and councils!

    "People throughout the UK are having their homes broken into, being evicted, having property seized and utilities cut off on a daily basis by private bailiff companies masquerading as court officials and who are then presenting court documents which are fraudulent!"

    http://axis-of-truth.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/press-release-uk-bailiffs-using.html

    Fraud is a serious CRIMINAL offence! This means that councils across Britain are committing serious CRIMINAL offences almost every day! The council staff are complicit in the FRAUD and can be held personally accountable and liable for their actions!
    NOW is the time for ALL inhabitants of all the counties to stand up to CRIMINALS in the private-for-profit corporate councils and make sure that each and every one is served Notice of Fraud so that they cannot deny willful involvement in CRIMINAL activity!

    Monday 9 June 2014

    Local Government Finance Act 1992 - CLARIFICATION & template letter...


    Letter to the Local Council, Councillors, MPs. and Police.

    It has come to our attention through the research of many diligent men and women, men and women who see the present system as one of ‘forcing’ Inhabitants of [YOUR LOCATION (COUNCIL DISTRICT OR BOROUGH) HERE] to pay for something they are not obliged to pay for. It would appear that Council Tax is both unlawful and illegal.

    The local council, ‘[YOUR LOCAL AUTHORITY HERE]’, claim their authority for demanding council tax is from the Local Government Finance Act 1992 (LGFA 1992).
    The council claim that the LGFA 1992 gives authority to demand tax on ‘Dwellings’ and that Inhabitants of the 'District' live in ‘Dwellings’, so the Inhabitants MUST pay council tax for the very fact that they live in ‘Dwellings’ in [YOUR LOCATION (COUNCIL DISTRICT OR BOROUGH) HERE].

    Please take note of words in bold italics.

    LGFA1992 section 1 Council Tax;

    1 Council tax in respect of dwellings.

    (1)As regards the financial year beginning in 1993 and subsequent financial years, each billing authority shall, in accordance with this Part, levy and collect a tax, to be called council tax, which shall be payable in respect of dwellings situated in its area.
    [F1] (2) In this Part “billing authority” means—
    (a) In relation to England, a district council or London borough council, the Common Council or the Council of the Isles of Scilly, and
    (b) In relation to Wales, a county council or county borough council.]
    (3)For the purposes of this Part the Secretary of State may make regulations containing rules for treating a dwelling as situated in a billing authority’s area if part only of the dwelling falls within the area.

    If we look at the meaning of ‘Dwelling’ in the LGFA 1992, section 3 of the act says;

    3 Meaning of “dwelling”.
    (1)This section has effect for determining what is a dwelling for the purposes of this Part.
    (2)Subject to the following provisions of this section, a dwelling is any property which—
    (a)by virtue of the definition of hereditament in section 115(1) of the M1General Rate Act 1967, would have been a hereditament for the purposes of that Act if that Act remained in forceand
    (b) is not for the time being shown or required to be shown in a local or a central non-domestic rating list in force at that timeand
    (c) is not for the time being exempt from local non-domestic rating for the purposes of Part III of the M2Local Government Finance Act 1988 (“the 1988 Act”);
    If we now look at the interpretation of the word hereditament in the General Rate Act 1967 (GRA 1967).

    115 Interpretation
    (1)In this Act, except where the context otherwise requires, the following expressions have the following meanings respectively, that is to say—
    ” agricultural land ” has the meaning assigned by section 26(3) of this Act;
    ” charges”, in Part VI of this Act, includes fees and expenses;
    ” clerk “, in relation to any authority or body, includes any officer of the authority or body authorised by them to act on their behalf either generally or in relation to any particular matter;
    ” the Commissioners ” means the Commissioners of Inland Revenue;
    ” dwelling-house ” means a hereditament which, in accordance with Schedule 13 to this Act, is used wholly for the purposes of a private dwelling or private dwellings;
    (3)A hereditament which—
    (a) Is a composite hereditament for the purposes of Part III of the 1988 Act; and
    (b)would still be such a hereditament if paragraphs (b) to (d) of section 66(1) of that Act (domestic property) were omitted, is also, subject to subsection (6) below, a dwelling for the purposes of this Part.
    (4)Subject to subsection (6) below, none of the following property, namely—
    (a) a yard, garden, outhouse or other appurtenance belonging to or enjoyed with property used wholly for the purposes of living accommodation; or
    (b) a private garage which either has a floor area of not more than 25 square metres or is used wholly or mainly for the accommodation of a private motor vehicle; or
    (c) private storage premises used wholly or mainly for the storage of articles of domestic use,
    is a dwelling except in so far as it forms part of a larger property which is itself a dwelling by virtue of subsection (2) above.
    (6)The Secretary of State may by order amend any definition of “dwelling” which is for the time being effective for the purposes of this Part.

    As of today [TODAYS DATE] this section of the LGFA1992 has not been amended.


    If we now look at the above mentioned LGFA 1988 to find the interpretation of hereditament, section 64;

    64 Hereditaments.
    (1)A hereditament is anything which, by virtue of the definition of hereditament in section 115(1) of the 1967 Act, would have been a hereditament for the purposes of that Act had this Act not been passed.
    (2)In addition, a right is a hereditament if it is a right to use any land for the purpose of exhibiting advertisements and—
    (a) the right is let out or reserved to any person other than the occupier of the land, or
    (b) where the land is not occupied for any other purpose, the right is let out or reserved to any person other than the owner of the land.
    (3)The Secretary of State may make regulations providing that in prescribed cases—
    (a) anything which would (apart from the regulations) be one hereditament shall be treated as more than one hereditament;
    (b) anything which would (apart from the regulations) be more than one hereditament shall be treated as one hereditament.
    [F1(3A)The Secretary of State may make regulations providing that where on any land there are two or more moorings which—
    (a) are owned by the same person,
    (b) are not domestic property, and
    (c) are separately occupied, or available for separate occupation, by persons other than that person
    (4)A hereditament is a relevant hereditament if it consists of property of any of the following descriptions—
    (a) lands;
    (b) coal mines;
    (c) mines of any other description, other than a mine of which the royalty or dues are for the time being wholly reserved in kind;
    (8)A hereditament is non-domestic if either—
    (a) it consists entirely of property which is not domestic, or
    (b) it is a composite hereditament.
    (9)A hereditament is composite if part only of it consists of domestic property.
    (10)A hereditament shall be treated as wholly or mainly used for charitable purposes at any time if at the time it is wholly or mainly used for the sale of goods donated to a charity and the proceeds of sale of the goods (after any deduction of expenses) are applied for the purposes of a charity.
    (11)In subsection (2) above “land” includes a wall or other part of a building and a sign, hoarding, frame, post or other structure erected or to be erected on land.
    [F4] (12) In subsections (3A) and (3B) above “owner”, in relation to a mooring, means the person who (if the mooring is let) is entitled to receive rent, whether on his own account or as agent or trustee for any other person, or (if the mooring is not let) would be so entitled if the mooring were let, and “owned” shall be construed accordingly.]

    Up until now you may have noticed, no mention of private ‘DOMESTIC’ property being liable for ‘rating’ or ‘council tax’, unless part only is used wholly or mainly for business. We can now see what the LGFA 1988 section 65 says;

    65 Owners and occupiers.
    (1)The owner of a hereditament or land is the person entitled to possession of it.
    (5)A hereditament which is not in use shall be treated as unoccupied if (apart from this subsection) it would be treated as occupied by reason only of there being kept in or on the hereditament plant, machinery or equipment—
    (a) which was used in or on the hereditament when it was last in use, or
    (b) which is intended for use in or on the hereditament.
    (6)A hereditament shall be treated as unoccupied if (apart from this subsection) it would be treated as occupied by reason only of—
    (a) the use of it for the holding of public meetings in furtherance of a person’s candidature at a parliamentary or local government election, or
    (b)if it is a house, the use of a room in it by a returning officer for the purpose of taking the poll in a parliamentary or local government election.
    (7)In subsection (6) above “returning officer” shall be construed in accordance with section 24 or 35 of the M1 Representation of the People Act 1983 (as the case may be).
    (8)A right which is a hereditament by virtue of section 64(2) above shall be treated as occupied by the person for the time being entitled to the right.
    [F2 (8A) In a case where—
    (a) land consisting of a hereditament is used (permanently or temporarily) for the exhibition of advertisements or for the erection of a structure used for the exhibition of advertisements,
    (b) section 64(2) above does not apply, and
    (c) apart from this subsection, the hereditament is not occupied,
    the hereditament shall be treated as occupied by the person permitting it to be so used or, if that person cannot be ascertained, its owner.]


    Again no mention of DOMESTIC property. We now consider the ‘interpretation’ of domestic property in the LGFA 1988 section 66;

    66 Domestic property.
    (1)[F1Subject to subsections (2), (2B) and 2E below], property is domestic if—
    (a) it is used wholly for the purposes of living accommodation,
    (b) it is a yard, garden, outhouse or other appurtenance belonging to or enjoyed with property falling within paragraph (a) above,
    (c) it is a private garage [F2which either has a floor area of 25 square metres or less or is] used wholly or mainly for the accommodation of a private motor vehicle, or
    (d) it is private storage premises used wholly or mainly for the storage of articles of domestic use.
    [F3(2) Property is not domestic property if it is wholly or mainly used in the course of a business for the provision of short-stay accommodation, that is to say accommodation—
    (a) which is provided for short periods to individuals whose sole or main residence is elsewhere, and
    (b) which is not self-contained self-catering accommodation provided commercially.
    (2B)A building or self-contained part of a building is not domestic property if—
    (a)the relevant person intends that, in the year beginning with the end of the day in relation to which the question is being considered, the whole of the building or self-contained part will be available for letting commercially, as self-catering accommodation, for short periods totalling 140 days or more, and
    (b) on that day his interest in the building or part is such as to enable him to let it for such periods.
    (2C)For the purposes of subsection (2B) the relevant person is—
    (a)where the property in question is a building and is not subject as a whole to a relevant leasehold interest, the person having the freehold interest in the whole of the building; and
    (b) in any other case, any person having a relevant leasehold interest in the building or self-contained part which is not subject (as a whole) to a single relevant leasehold interest inferior to his interest.
    (2D)Subsection (2B) above does not apply where the building or self-contained part is used as the sole or main residence of any person [F5. . .]
    [F6 (2E)Property is not domestic property if it is timeshare accommodation within the meaning of the Timeshare Act 1992.]
    [F7(3)Subsection (1) above does not apply in the case of a pitch occupied by a caravan, but if in such a case the caravan is the sole or main residence of an individual, the pitch and the caravan, together with any garden, yard, outhouse or other appurtenance belonging to or enjoyed with them, are domestic property]
    [F8(4)Subsection (1) above does not apply in the case of a mooring occupied by a boat, but if in such a case the boat is the sole or main residence of an individual, the mooring and the boat, together with any garden, yard, outhouse or other appurtenance belonging to or enjoyed with them, are domestic property.
    (4A)Subsection (3) or (4) above does not have effect in the case of a pitch occupied by a caravan, or a mooring occupied by a boat, which is an appurtenance enjoyed with other property to which subsection (1)(a) above applies]
     (5)Property not in use is domestic if it appears that when next in use it will be domestic.
    (6 )F9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    (7)Whether anything is a caravan shall be construed in accordance with Part I of the M1Caravan Sites and Control of Development Act 1960.
    (8 )F9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    [F10(8A)In this section—
    “business” includes—
    (a)any activity carried on by a body of persons, whether corporate or unincorporated, and
    (b)any activity carried on by a charity;
    “commercially” means on a commercial basis, and with a view to the realisation of profits; and
    “relevant leasehold interest” means an interest under a lease or underlease which was granted for a term of 6 months or more and conferred the right to exclusive possession throughout the term.]
    (9)The Secretary of State may by order amend, or substitute another definition for, any definition of domestic property for the time being effective for the purposes of this Part.

    As of today [TODAYS DATE]  this section of the LGFA1992 has not been amended.

    We now consider the ‘interpretations’ given within the LGFA 1988 section 67;

    67 Interpretation: other provisions.

    (1)Unless the context otherwise requires, references to lists are to local and central non-domestic rating lists.
    (2)Unless the context otherwise requires, references to valuation officers are to valuation officers for [F1 billing authorities]and the central valuation officer.
    (3)A right or other property is a hereditament on a particular day if (and only if) it is a hereditament immediately before the day ends.
    (4)A hereditament is relevant, non-domestic, composite, unoccupied or wholly or partly occupied on a particular day if (and only if) it is relevant, non-domestic, composite, unoccupied or wholly or partly occupied (as the case may be) immediately before the day ends.
    (5)For the purpose of deciding the extent (if any) to which a hereditament consists of domestic property on a particular day,[F2 or is a Crown hereditament on a particular day,] or is exempt from local non-domestic rating on a particular day, the state of affairs existing immediately before the day ends shall be treated as having existed throughout the day.
    [F3 (5A)In subsection (5) above “Crown hereditament” has the same meaning as in section 65A above.]
     (6)A person is the owner, or in occupation of all or part, of a hereditament on a particular day if (and only if) he is its owner or in such occupation (as the case may be) immediately before the day ends.
    (7)A relevant provision applies on a particular day if (and only if) it applies immediately before the day ends; and for this purpose relevant provisions are sections 43(6), 45(6) and 47(2) above.
    (8)For the purpose of deciding what is shown in a list for a particular day the state of the list as it has effect immediately before the day ends shall be treated as having been its state throughout the day; and “effect” here includes any effect which is retrospective by virtue of an alteration of the list.
    (9)A hereditament shall be treated as shown in a central non-domestic rating list for a day if on the day it falls within a class of hereditament shown for the day in the list; and for this purpose a hereditament falls within a class on a particular day if (and only if) it falls within the class immediately before the day ends.
    [F4 (9A)In subsection (9) above “class” means a class expressed by reference to whether hereditaments—
    (a)are occupied or owned by a person designated under section 53(1) above, and
    (b)fall within any description prescribed in relation to him under section 53(1).]
    (10)A charity is an institution or other organisation established for charitable purposes only or any persons administering a trust established for charitable purposes only.
    (11)The M11967 Act is the General Rate Act 1967.
    (12)Nothing in a private or local Act passed before this Act shall have the effect that a hereditament is exempt as regards non-domestic rating, or prevent a person being subject to a non-domestic rate, or prevent a person being designated or a description of hereditament being prescribed under section 53 above.
    (13)This section and sections 64 to 66 above apply for the purposes of this Part.

    If we are not mistaken it would appear that the only property liable to Council Tax is a ‘Dwelling’ and a ‘Dwelling’ is not Domestic Property, a ‘Dwelling’, it would appear is a ‘hereditament’.
    The above are not my “opinions”, they are the LAW as it is ‘interpreted’ by Parliamentarians, Judges, the Courts and all agents of the Government including ‘[YOUR LOCAL AUTHORITY HERE]’. It would appear that a hereditament in respect of Domestic Property is a Domestic Property that part only is used, wholly or mainly, for the running of a commercial  business for profit, or, a charitable concern, or, a room used for the local prospective candidates for Public meetings, or, exhibition advertising signs, or, storage of plant and machinery, indeed anything but DOMESTIC PROPERTY used wholly for LIVING ACCOMMODATION.

    Interpretations;
    ” hereditament” means property which is or may become liable to a rate, being a unit of such property which is, or would fall to be, shown as a separate item in the valuation list;
    ” profits basis “, in relation to the valuation of a hereditament, means the ascertainment of the value of that hereditament by reference to the accounts, receipts or profits of an undertaking carried on therein;

    In consideration of the above facts we the ‘inhabitants of the [YOUR LOCATION (COUNCIL DISTRICT OR BOROUGH) HERE], expect you the ‘elected representatives’ to give this matter your full and undivided attention, in ascertaining whether ‘inhabitants of the Area’ residing in ‘domestic properties’ should be ‘forced’ to contribute towards the council’s coffers. Forced by way of a tax on the ‘inhabitants of the 'District’ who are not obliged ‘by law’ to contribute.

    If we are also not mistaken, ‘forcing’ inhabitants to pay for this insidious TAX is dare we say it, SLAVERY. For councils to have taken by force from ignorant, yes IGNORANT, people for 20 years without once letting up on the pressure to ‘pay’. To strip people of their property, to drive them from their homes, to steal ‘unpaid’ money from wages and benefits and to send ‘non-payers’ to prison for failing to ‘pay’ is, let’s be honest, just……EVIL. Many of these victims could not ‘pay’, not, would not ‘pay’.

    So Mr. MP., Mr. Councillor, Mr. Judge, Mr. Policeman where do we go from here, do you do your job or do we do it for you?

    All of the above can and should be checked and verified.

    All of the above can be found on-line at www.legislation.gov.uk and do check out
    Part III of the M2 Local Government Finance Act 1988 
    There you will find many more definitions of HEREDITAMENT