Council Tax suggestions from Daniel Bostock

Some Council Tax suggestions from Daniel Bostock
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JstaIKCueyc


A useful anti-terrorism Council Tax template for adaptation:

Your name xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your address xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2018
Name from letter or council name xxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ref xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your Letter dated xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For the attention of the Council 151 officer 
Dear Sir/Madam. 
Application for discount under Section 13a of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 
It has come to my attention that the Council is involved in the funding of Terrorists. I would like the 151 officer to investigate my complaint and file a report. This matter should also be treated as an application for discount under Section 13a of the Local Government Finance Act 1992. It would be a serious breach of Council procedure to ignore my application. The application is for a reduction to ZERO. Any enforcement action should be stopped while this application is being processed. I have recently come into information that indicates that the Council is funding acts of terrorism which is a breach of Article 3 Section 15 of the Terrorism Act 2000. Some of the evidence I have come across indicates that: 
On the 7th July 2005 Terrorist attacks were carried out, in London, by MI5 with the assistance of Mossad. UK Police were involved in the subsequent cover up of these attacks. https://youtu.be/kwyzpzEgUWE

The shooting to death of unarmed Anthony Grainger in 2012 by Greater Manchester Police. This being one of 1518 people killed by police contact since 2005http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2315777/The-memory-stick-killing-When-police-lost-data-card-names-1-000-informants-questioned-father--cleared-Two-months-later-shot-dead.html... 
The assault on peaceful protesters by multiple UK Police forces in support of Cuadrilla and Third Energy Corporations attempting to poison the water Aquifers using Hydraulic Fracturing in Lancashire and Yorkshire. 
https://drillordrop.com/.../lancashire-police-face.../
The Conviction of the UK government in the international War Crime commission for the illegal invasion of IRAQ killing an estimated 1 million men women and children. https://www.aljazeera.com/.../11/20111128105712109215.html

The support of the UK government for the Genocide being carried out in GAZA. The murder of men women and children using Tax collected by the UK Government. https://electronicintifada.net/content/genocide-gaza/6397

Council Tax is funding acts of Terrorism using outlawed Cluster-bombs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Uj72JNfFUg

I put you on notice that I am withholding payment of Council Tax until such time as the Council can demonstrate to me that they are no longer funding acts of Terrorism. 

Furthermore:
The local Government Finance Act 1992 and/or the Council Tax Admin & Enforcement regulation 1992 are non-applicable in this matter. When a service is provided by an organisation, be it a council or other, they have to act within the Law, contract Law in this case. You also cannot ignore Constitutional Law, or repeal it.

There is no contract with yourself and myself xxxyourxnamexxxxx. The terms of an agreement must be sufficiently certain or the agreement will be void for uncertainty. Where a contract is void it is automatically of no effect from the very beginning.

I, nor a council, can suggest they can ignore the Law with no consequence, and act in an illegal manner to obtain finances through menaces. Thus getting a secondary company involved is creating something that is, unlawful and illegal in its actions. We should remember that you are civil servants who serve the public, not the other way around.

A‘void’ order or claim has no legal effect ab initio (from the beginning/outset) and therefore does not need to be appealed, although for convenience it may sometimes be necessary to have it set aside (Lord Denning in MacFoy v United Africa Co. Ltd. [1961] and Firman v Ellis [1978]) whereas a ‘voidable’ order or claim has legal effect unless and until it is set aside. Therefore, while a void order or claim does not have to be obeyed and can be ignored and its nullity can be relied on as a defence when necessary (Wandsworth London Borough Council v. Winder [1985] A.C. 461), a voidable order or claim has to be obeyed and cannot be ignored unless and until it is set aside. In Bellinger v Bellinger [2003] UKHL 21 the House of Lords confirmed that a void act is void from the outset and no Court – not even the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) - has jurisdiction to give legal effect to a void act no matter how unreasonable that may seem, because doing so would mean reforming the law which no Court has power to do because such power rests only with Parliament. The duty of the Court is to interpret and apply the law not reform or create it.

Obviously I have a legal claim on you (the council) not the company you’ve fraudulently used to demand money through menaces. So we seek address from the civil service as, quite wrongly, you've acted in an illegal manner.

So currently acting unlawfully. Fraud in Fact by Deceit Obfuscation and Denial and Theft “ACTUAL FRAUD. Creating a deception and concealing something or making a false representation, causing mental injury to an individual.

Acting outside of the Law and demanding money through menaces. The Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act, 1994 clearly states; It shall be an offence for any person who, with a view to gain for himself or another or with intent to cause loss to another, makes any unwarranted demand with menaces.

(2) For the purposes of this section—

(a) a demand with menaces shall be unwarranted unless the person making it does so in the belief—

(i) that he has reasonable grounds for making the demand, and

(ii) that the use of the menaces is a proper means of reinforcing the demand;

(b) the nature of the act or omission demanded shall be immaterial and it shall also be immaterial whether or not the menaces relate to action to be taken by the person making the demand.

(3) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable—

(a) on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding £1,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both,

(b) on conviction on indictment to a fine or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years or to both.

I Your namexxxxxxxxxxxxxxxb will also point out that any future liabilities will be paid by the council on my behalf in accordance with the Local Govt Act 1888 c41 part V proceedings of a council and committee section 79 subsection 2.

Yours Sincerely,
Signaturexxxxxxxxxx
Namexxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

County Councils engaging in fraud & false accounting.

COUNTY COUNCILS, UP & DOWN BRITAIN, ENGAGING IN FRAUD THROUGH FALSE ACCOUNTING & KEEPING DUAL ACCOUNTING RECORDS!!

One council has been found with over £302 MILLION surplus !
We need to boycott these charlatan predators, who are mere passengers on the People of England.
The latest Council Tax SCAM: County Councils are starting to put ILLEGAL CHARGES by attempted theft on people's homes for illicit council 'tax' collections which they are NOT permitted to enforce nor impose on anyone.
They operate under STATUTES which are NOT Law, because they have never been ratified through Parliament, and which require everyone's CONSENT! Do not grant it.
These Draconian private Institutions posing as "Government" are unable to enforce their invalid monetary demands via HMCTS which rely upon the Law of Contract - because they have never contracted with any of us! So instead, they dishonestly hire Magistrates Court rooms to try to intimidate people to pay up on these CIVIL and UNENFORCEABLE collections, for their illegal and unconstitutional financial demands. When that doesn't work, they use hired thugs posing as "bailiffs" and other unlawful means. But lately it has got much worse:
These robber barons, empowered by the Rothschild-Regime of the nasty 'common purpose' misnamed "charity" which brainwashes and de-sensitises employees to commit unconscionable acts of treason without batting an eyelid.....these lazy profligate County Councils, with legions of councillors sucking on the teat of their bloated payroll and running further private companies which commit "insider dealings" with these Councils for their hugely over-valued services - and the massive surpluses are used to fund paedophile rings, satanic ritual abuse through police and schools etc, terrorism and all manner of unsavoury activities - being the main reason I CHOOSE TO REFUSE TO (ILLEGAL) PAY COUNCIL 'TAX'.
Now, however, they are becoming desperate with more and more people waking up and boycotting their unlawful demands for council tax, fed up of them lining their pockets in their PRIVATE CORPORATIONS (often foreign owned, such is their cheek) running for their private interests and profits! So they are resorting to trying to put charging orders on people's homes! They are doing this through their collusion with HMLR Land Registry, who through deception of the 'Registration' process on properties, have seized your Freehold and unlawfully transferred it to the Crown without you understanding this, and made you a mere Tenant on your own Freehold (or so they think)! Thus sets in "Council Tax" under this rotten invasive Regime.
However, they CAN'T get a charge on your home, regardless of their lying thieving documents pretending to be "orders", because the Law of England states that to put a charge on ANY property it requires a DEED - and only you the owner can grant that date which has to be compliant with the Law of Property Act (misc Provisions) 1989 and be duly witnessed with an accompanying valid bi-lateral CONTRACT to comply with the Bill of Exchange Act 1882 and be executed in front of you! If none of these things happen, then any 'charge' (alleged) would be put there by fraudulent means and be treated as NULL and VOID and constitute a forgery and so be an indictable offence.
It can be removed by immediately filing a DS-1 form with HMLR and the Property Chamber to remove the false 'charge' on the basis it was procured by deception and in contravention to the Law of Property Act (Misc Provisions) 1989 Section 1, which lawfully requires that any charge is only placed on a property by way of a valid and compliant Deed, and that means the Deed must be granted by you with YOUR consent, duly witnessed and executed in front of you with an accompanying valid Contract! If none of these steps took place, then the Council have committed a serious offence under Section 2,3 & 4 of the Fraud Act 2006 (Fraudulent misrepresentation, Fraud by non-disclosure, Fraud by abuse of position).
KNOW YOUR COMMON LAW RIGHTS !
(Submitted by Elizabeth Watson, Founder of ONE VOICE ACTION GROUP)

The White Rabbit Trust on youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFumn8WqygU

Police being funded for what exactly?

Stories about the police refusing to investigate crimes in areas across the country have been emerging for some time.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/police-victims-failed-confidence-reporting-dangerous-support-criminal-justice-system-a8476811.html

http://www.thewestonmercury.co.uk/news/north-somerset-burglaries-increase-as-police-officer-numbers-fall-1-5630112

Locals in Sheffield were assaulted by 'security' who were protected by police and some were even arrested by police for trying to obstruct the felling of their precious trees
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/security-guard-not-investigated-for-allegedly-punching-sheffield-tree-protester-1-9293451

Some police forces are accepting "gifts" (ie bribes) but are refusing to disclose about them
https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/police-force-refuses-reveal-gift-14978800

And the very serious issue of police assisted evictions and bank repossessions, where police assist bailiffs in what are strictly "Civil Matters". The police are assisting in thousands of illegal evictions of local tax payers, with serious disregard for the law that they are sworn to serve.
https://nearlylegal.co.uk/2010/07/illegal-eviction-and-the-police/

In addition, police are protecting the private & registered companies masquerading as councils as they illegally sell-off Public Assets!
https://thebristolcable.org/2016/04/police-and-private-security-protect-auction-of-council-homes/

If Council Tax funds the police but the police don't serve those that pay them, there is a serious problem for all local habitants and legally a 'Conflict of Interest' and 'Misconduct in Public Office (a serious criminal offence). Each and every habitant who is not served by the police should immediately stop paying councils until local police uphold the Law and serve the local habitants. It's basic common sense!