The 'revelations' about council pension funds heavily invested in the Fracking industries should come as no surprise to many who have followed the blatant fraud and dodgy investments of the corporate councils. When the council pension funds were found to be heavily invested in illegal weapons manufacture (such as cluster munitions and white phosphorus) it became obvious that many of the entirely corporate (therefore private & for profit) councils were guilty of Misappropriation of Public Funds and Misconduct in Public Office by definition in Law, and should not be supported at all. This gave further impetus & incentive to withdraw any further form of consent (ie registrations & payment of local rates & taxes) to the flagrant breaches of trust that were/are being perpetrated against local habitants of counties. For locals to discover that those who channel funding to abusive 'policing', to protection of Fracking companies are the same corporate groups that invest in arms, that steal children and homes from families, that neglect roads, that sell-off Public Assets, that reward themselves with vast secure & private pensions, that reward themselves with often 6 figure pay levels and massive redundancy packages, that have borrowed vast sums privately using their registered locals as 'securities' for the high interest debts, that hold massive "Unusable Reserve" accounts that were created using millions of pounds of Public Funds (in many cases more than enough to offset all alleged debt), has obviously changed the ways in which large numbers view the local corporate 'leaders' and their lackeys!
https://drillordrop.com/2018/09/03/uk-councils-invest-9bn-of-pension-funds-in-fracking-companies-new-research/
The habitants of Greater Manchester should be particularly concerned, as should be their neighbours in (bankrupt) Lancashire. GMC is the largest council investor in Fracking, while they send their particularly nasty corporate 'police' to abuse, assault, arrest, harass and intimidate legitimate peaceful protest by people wanting to protect their land and water:
http://salfordstar.com/article.asp?id=4692
The truth will not go away. ANY councils that have pension funds invested in Fracking are in direct Conflict of Interest. They are frauds and criminals, guilty of Misappropriation of Public Funds whilst imposing the fraud of "austerity" upon the people that pay them. When enough people realise the huge con of the corporate councils, they will want to force divestment from arms and fracking industries, to force the corporate councils to reveal the amounts of Public Funds held in longterm & secretive investments, to force the corporate councils to sack (without pension) the criminals that drove whole counties into private debt & paid themselves huge sums for doing so! They may wish to STOP paying any further Council Taxes or rates to force the corrupted councils to do their jobs and serve the people!
Thursday, 27 September 2018
Monday, 24 September 2018
Some good advice about alleged 'debt'
For those unaware of how debt works here's a quick summary.
1) You 'contract' with a company or you don't if its a Government body. Either way you are expected to pay.You can dispute this at any time by asking for the contractual agreement signed by you to prove liability. It's likely they will just ignore the request and push you straight to a third party debt collection agency.
2) A liability order is considered to be genuine if it contains the 'original amount of the debt' without charges and also has absolutely no branding of the debt collection agency. If it has extra charges then consider it to be fake and if its on their own headed paper also consider it to be fake.
3) Most companies have the ability to write off outstanding debt and they do this by selling it off to a third party enforcement company. From that point the debt is no longer owed by you in lawful terms and now it is up to the third party to recover the debt.
Now some people slip up here as they do not understand that these accumulated debts are sold off to the third party at a fraction of the price so a £5000 debt may be sold for less than 1/5th of the amount however they are still expecting £5000+ from you. This is one of the reasons the process of adding fees and their individual amounts is nothing more than extortion.
4) These third party debt collectors have very little power in terms of the law and so in order to retrieve the debt they have to 'strong arm' and you see this with various letters increasing in forceful language. They certainly cannot enlist the assistance of the Publicly Funded Law Enforcement to force entry or payment from you. In order to even reach this stage they would need to apply for a liability order which under normal circumstances would be rejected as these are Civil Matters yet they are applied for in Criminal Circumstances.
5) If they try to bullshit you with a liability order and the Police to assist then inform the Police they are only to be used for Civil matters and not as 'muscle for hire' for Private Companies. Then inform the debt collector you wish to see the original Liability order and not one just stamped and not signed. They won't have it because no judge would sign their name to what is not regarded as a criminal offence.
So simply put third party debt collectors are very much like traders. They buy low and try to recoup the full amount with the additional fees as a 'bonus' but once they buy the debt they are the ones liable and not you!
Negotiation in this situation can be a great tactic because you could bring down the existing debt, if you owe one, substantially however in order to do that you are accepting liability so remember that when making your move
Monday, 27 August 2018
Council Tax suggestions from Daniel Bostock
Some Council Tax suggestions from Daniel Bostock
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JstaIKCueyc
A useful anti-terrorism Council Tax template for adaptation:
Your name xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your address xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2018
Name from letter or council name xxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ref xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your Letter dated xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For the attention of the Council 151 officer
Dear Sir/Madam.
Application for discount under Section 13a of the Local Government Finance Act 1992
It has come to my attention that the Council is involved in the funding of Terrorists. I would like the 151 officer to investigate my complaint and file a report. This matter should also be treated as an application for discount under Section 13a of the Local Government Finance Act 1992. It would be a serious breach of Council procedure to ignore my application. The application is for a reduction to ZERO. Any enforcement action should be stopped while this application is being processed. I have recently come into information that indicates that the Council is funding acts of terrorism which is a breach of Article 3 Section 15 of the Terrorism Act 2000. Some of the evidence I have come across indicates that:
On the 7th July 2005 Terrorist attacks were carried out, in London, by MI5 with the assistance of Mossad. UK Police were involved in the subsequent cover up of these attacks. https://youtu.be/kwyzpzEgUWE
The shooting to death of unarmed Anthony Grainger in 2012 by Greater Manchester Police. This being one of 1518 people killed by police contact since 2005http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2315777/The-memory-stick-killing-When-police-lost-data-card-names-1-000-informants-questioned-father--cleared-Two-months-later-shot-dead.html...
The assault on peaceful protesters by multiple UK Police forces in support of Cuadrilla and Third Energy Corporations attempting to poison the water Aquifers using Hydraulic Fracturing in Lancashire and Yorkshire.
https://drillordrop.com/.../lancashire-police-face.../
The Conviction of the UK government in the international War Crime commission for the illegal invasion of IRAQ killing an estimated 1 million men women and children. https://www.aljazeera.com/.../11/20111128105712109215.html
The support of the UK government for the Genocide being carried out in GAZA. The murder of men women and children using Tax collected by the UK Government. https://electronicintifada.net/content/genocide-gaza/6397
Council Tax is funding acts of Terrorism using outlawed Cluster-bombs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Uj72JNfFUg
I put you on notice that I am withholding payment of Council Tax until such time as the Council can demonstrate to me that they are no longer funding acts of Terrorism.
Furthermore:
The local Government Finance Act 1992 and/or the Council Tax Admin & Enforcement regulation 1992 are non-applicable in this matter. When a service is provided by an organisation, be it a council or other, they have to act within the Law, contract Law in this case. You also cannot ignore Constitutional Law, or repeal it.
There is no contract with yourself and myself xxxyourxnamexxxxx. The terms of an agreement must be sufficiently certain or the agreement will be void for uncertainty. Where a contract is void it is automatically of no effect from the very beginning.
I, nor a council, can suggest they can ignore the Law with no consequence, and act in an illegal manner to obtain finances through menaces. Thus getting a secondary company involved is creating something that is, unlawful and illegal in its actions. We should remember that you are civil servants who serve the public, not the other way around.
A‘void’ order or claim has no legal effect ab initio (from the beginning/outset) and therefore does not need to be appealed, although for convenience it may sometimes be necessary to have it set aside (Lord Denning in MacFoy v United Africa Co. Ltd. [1961] and Firman v Ellis [1978]) whereas a ‘voidable’ order or claim has legal effect unless and until it is set aside. Therefore, while a void order or claim does not have to be obeyed and can be ignored and its nullity can be relied on as a defence when necessary (Wandsworth London Borough Council v. Winder [1985] A.C. 461), a voidable order or claim has to be obeyed and cannot be ignored unless and until it is set aside. In Bellinger v Bellinger [2003] UKHL 21 the House of Lords confirmed that a void act is void from the outset and no Court – not even the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) - has jurisdiction to give legal effect to a void act no matter how unreasonable that may seem, because doing so would mean reforming the law which no Court has power to do because such power rests only with Parliament. The duty of the Court is to interpret and apply the law not reform or create it.
Obviously I have a legal claim on you (the council) not the company you’ve fraudulently used to demand money through menaces. So we seek address from the civil service as, quite wrongly, you've acted in an illegal manner.
So currently acting unlawfully. Fraud in Fact by Deceit Obfuscation and Denial and Theft “ACTUAL FRAUD. Creating a deception and concealing something or making a false representation, causing mental injury to an individual.
Acting outside of the Law and demanding money through menaces. The Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act, 1994 clearly states; It shall be an offence for any person who, with a view to gain for himself or another or with intent to cause loss to another, makes any unwarranted demand with menaces.
(2) For the purposes of this section—
(a) a demand with menaces shall be unwarranted unless the person making it does so in the belief—
(i) that he has reasonable grounds for making the demand, and
(ii) that the use of the menaces is a proper means of reinforcing the demand;
(b) the nature of the act or omission demanded shall be immaterial and it shall also be immaterial whether or not the menaces relate to action to be taken by the person making the demand.
(3) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable—
(a) on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding £1,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both,
(b) on conviction on indictment to a fine or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years or to both.
I Your namexxxxxxxxxxxxxxxb will also point out that any future liabilities will be paid by the council on my behalf in accordance with the Local Govt Act 1888 c41 part V proceedings of a council and committee section 79 subsection 2.
Yours Sincerely,
Signaturexxxxxxxxxx
Namexxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JstaIKCueyc
A useful anti-terrorism Council Tax template for adaptation:
Your name xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your address xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2018
Name from letter or council name xxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ref xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your Letter dated xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For the attention of the Council 151 officer
Dear Sir/Madam.
Application for discount under Section 13a of the Local Government Finance Act 1992
It has come to my attention that the Council is involved in the funding of Terrorists. I would like the 151 officer to investigate my complaint and file a report. This matter should also be treated as an application for discount under Section 13a of the Local Government Finance Act 1992. It would be a serious breach of Council procedure to ignore my application. The application is for a reduction to ZERO. Any enforcement action should be stopped while this application is being processed. I have recently come into information that indicates that the Council is funding acts of terrorism which is a breach of Article 3 Section 15 of the Terrorism Act 2000. Some of the evidence I have come across indicates that:
On the 7th July 2005 Terrorist attacks were carried out, in London, by MI5 with the assistance of Mossad. UK Police were involved in the subsequent cover up of these attacks. https://youtu.be/kwyzpzEgUWE
The shooting to death of unarmed Anthony Grainger in 2012 by Greater Manchester Police. This being one of 1518 people killed by police contact since 2005http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2315777/The-memory-stick-killing-When-police-lost-data-card-names-1-000-informants-questioned-father--cleared-Two-months-later-shot-dead.html...
The assault on peaceful protesters by multiple UK Police forces in support of Cuadrilla and Third Energy Corporations attempting to poison the water Aquifers using Hydraulic Fracturing in Lancashire and Yorkshire.
https://drillordrop.com/.../lancashire-police-face.../
The Conviction of the UK government in the international War Crime commission for the illegal invasion of IRAQ killing an estimated 1 million men women and children. https://www.aljazeera.com/.../11/20111128105712109215.html
The support of the UK government for the Genocide being carried out in GAZA. The murder of men women and children using Tax collected by the UK Government. https://electronicintifada.net/content/genocide-gaza/6397
Council Tax is funding acts of Terrorism using outlawed Cluster-bombs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Uj72JNfFUg
I put you on notice that I am withholding payment of Council Tax until such time as the Council can demonstrate to me that they are no longer funding acts of Terrorism.
Furthermore:
The local Government Finance Act 1992 and/or the Council Tax Admin & Enforcement regulation 1992 are non-applicable in this matter. When a service is provided by an organisation, be it a council or other, they have to act within the Law, contract Law in this case. You also cannot ignore Constitutional Law, or repeal it.
There is no contract with yourself and myself xxxyourxnamexxxxx. The terms of an agreement must be sufficiently certain or the agreement will be void for uncertainty. Where a contract is void it is automatically of no effect from the very beginning.
I, nor a council, can suggest they can ignore the Law with no consequence, and act in an illegal manner to obtain finances through menaces. Thus getting a secondary company involved is creating something that is, unlawful and illegal in its actions. We should remember that you are civil servants who serve the public, not the other way around.
A‘void’ order or claim has no legal effect ab initio (from the beginning/outset) and therefore does not need to be appealed, although for convenience it may sometimes be necessary to have it set aside (Lord Denning in MacFoy v United Africa Co. Ltd. [1961] and Firman v Ellis [1978]) whereas a ‘voidable’ order or claim has legal effect unless and until it is set aside. Therefore, while a void order or claim does not have to be obeyed and can be ignored and its nullity can be relied on as a defence when necessary (Wandsworth London Borough Council v. Winder [1985] A.C. 461), a voidable order or claim has to be obeyed and cannot be ignored unless and until it is set aside. In Bellinger v Bellinger [2003] UKHL 21 the House of Lords confirmed that a void act is void from the outset and no Court – not even the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) - has jurisdiction to give legal effect to a void act no matter how unreasonable that may seem, because doing so would mean reforming the law which no Court has power to do because such power rests only with Parliament. The duty of the Court is to interpret and apply the law not reform or create it.
Obviously I have a legal claim on you (the council) not the company you’ve fraudulently used to demand money through menaces. So we seek address from the civil service as, quite wrongly, you've acted in an illegal manner.
So currently acting unlawfully. Fraud in Fact by Deceit Obfuscation and Denial and Theft “ACTUAL FRAUD. Creating a deception and concealing something or making a false representation, causing mental injury to an individual.
Acting outside of the Law and demanding money through menaces. The Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act, 1994 clearly states; It shall be an offence for any person who, with a view to gain for himself or another or with intent to cause loss to another, makes any unwarranted demand with menaces.
(2) For the purposes of this section—
(a) a demand with menaces shall be unwarranted unless the person making it does so in the belief—
(i) that he has reasonable grounds for making the demand, and
(ii) that the use of the menaces is a proper means of reinforcing the demand;
(b) the nature of the act or omission demanded shall be immaterial and it shall also be immaterial whether or not the menaces relate to action to be taken by the person making the demand.
(3) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable—
(a) on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding £1,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both,
(b) on conviction on indictment to a fine or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years or to both.
I Your namexxxxxxxxxxxxxxxb will also point out that any future liabilities will be paid by the council on my behalf in accordance with the Local Govt Act 1888 c41 part V proceedings of a council and committee section 79 subsection 2.
Yours Sincerely,
Signaturexxxxxxxxxx
Namexxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Wednesday, 22 August 2018
County Councils engaging in fraud & false accounting.
COUNTY COUNCILS, UP & DOWN BRITAIN, ENGAGING IN FRAUD THROUGH FALSE ACCOUNTING & KEEPING DUAL ACCOUNTING RECORDS!!
One council has been found with over £302 MILLION surplus !
We need to boycott these charlatan predators, who are mere passengers on the People of England.
The latest Council Tax SCAM: County Councils are starting to put ILLEGAL CHARGES by attempted theft on people's homes for illicit council 'tax' collections which they are NOT permitted to enforce nor impose on anyone.
They operate under STATUTES which are NOT Law, because they have never been ratified through Parliament, and which require everyone's CONSENT! Do not grant it.
These Draconian private Institutions posing as "Government" are unable to enforce their invalid monetary demands via HMCTS which rely upon the Law of Contract - because they have never contracted with any of us! So instead, they dishonestly hire Magistrates Court rooms to try to intimidate people to pay up on these CIVIL and UNENFORCEABLE collections, for their illegal and unconstitutional financial demands. When that doesn't work, they use hired thugs posing as "bailiffs" and other unlawful means. But lately it has got much worse:
These robber barons, empowered by the Rothschild-Regime of the nasty 'common purpose' misnamed "charity" which brainwashes and de-sensitises employees to commit unconscionable acts of treason without batting an eyelid.....these lazy profligate County Councils, with legions of councillors sucking on the teat of their bloated payroll and running further private companies which commit "insider dealings" with these Councils for their hugely over-valued services - and the massive surpluses are used to fund paedophile rings, satanic ritual abuse through police and schools etc, terrorism and all manner of unsavoury activities - being the main reason I CHOOSE TO REFUSE TO (ILLEGAL) PAY COUNCIL 'TAX'.
Now, however, they are becoming desperate with more and more people waking up and boycotting their unlawful demands for council tax, fed up of them lining their pockets in their PRIVATE CORPORATIONS (often foreign owned, such is their cheek) running for their private interests and profits! So they are resorting to trying to put charging orders on people's homes! They are doing this through their collusion with HMLR Land Registry, who through deception of the 'Registration' process on properties, have seized your Freehold and unlawfully transferred it to the Crown without you understanding this, and made you a mere Tenant on your own Freehold (or so they think)! Thus sets in "Council Tax" under this rotten invasive Regime.
However, they CAN'T get a charge on your home, regardless of their lying thieving documents pretending to be "orders", because the Law of England states that to put a charge on ANY property it requires a DEED - and only you the owner can grant that date which has to be compliant with the Law of Property Act (misc Provisions) 1989 and be duly witnessed with an accompanying valid bi-lateral CONTRACT to comply with the Bill of Exchange Act 1882 and be executed in front of you! If none of these things happen, then any 'charge' (alleged) would be put there by fraudulent means and be treated as NULL and VOID and constitute a forgery and so be an indictable offence.
It can be removed by immediately filing a DS-1 form with HMLR and the Property Chamber to remove the false 'charge' on the basis it was procured by deception and in contravention to the Law of Property Act (Misc Provisions) 1989 Section 1, which lawfully requires that any charge is only placed on a property by way of a valid and compliant Deed, and that means the Deed must be granted by you with YOUR consent, duly witnessed and executed in front of you with an accompanying valid Contract! If none of these steps took place, then the Council have committed a serious offence under Section 2,3 & 4 of the Fraud Act 2006 (Fraudulent misrepresentation, Fraud by non-disclosure, Fraud by abuse of position).
KNOW YOUR COMMON LAW RIGHTS !
(Submitted by Elizabeth Watson, Founder of ONE VOICE ACTION GROUP)
One council has been found with over £302 MILLION surplus !
We need to boycott these charlatan predators, who are mere passengers on the People of England.
The latest Council Tax SCAM: County Councils are starting to put ILLEGAL CHARGES by attempted theft on people's homes for illicit council 'tax' collections which they are NOT permitted to enforce nor impose on anyone.
They operate under STATUTES which are NOT Law, because they have never been ratified through Parliament, and which require everyone's CONSENT! Do not grant it.
These Draconian private Institutions posing as "Government" are unable to enforce their invalid monetary demands via HMCTS which rely upon the Law of Contract - because they have never contracted with any of us! So instead, they dishonestly hire Magistrates Court rooms to try to intimidate people to pay up on these CIVIL and UNENFORCEABLE collections, for their illegal and unconstitutional financial demands. When that doesn't work, they use hired thugs posing as "bailiffs" and other unlawful means. But lately it has got much worse:
These robber barons, empowered by the Rothschild-Regime of the nasty 'common purpose' misnamed "charity" which brainwashes and de-sensitises employees to commit unconscionable acts of treason without batting an eyelid.....these lazy profligate County Councils, with legions of councillors sucking on the teat of their bloated payroll and running further private companies which commit "insider dealings" with these Councils for their hugely over-valued services - and the massive surpluses are used to fund paedophile rings, satanic ritual abuse through police and schools etc, terrorism and all manner of unsavoury activities - being the main reason I CHOOSE TO REFUSE TO (ILLEGAL) PAY COUNCIL 'TAX'.
Now, however, they are becoming desperate with more and more people waking up and boycotting their unlawful demands for council tax, fed up of them lining their pockets in their PRIVATE CORPORATIONS (often foreign owned, such is their cheek) running for their private interests and profits! So they are resorting to trying to put charging orders on people's homes! They are doing this through their collusion with HMLR Land Registry, who through deception of the 'Registration' process on properties, have seized your Freehold and unlawfully transferred it to the Crown without you understanding this, and made you a mere Tenant on your own Freehold (or so they think)! Thus sets in "Council Tax" under this rotten invasive Regime.
However, they CAN'T get a charge on your home, regardless of their lying thieving documents pretending to be "orders", because the Law of England states that to put a charge on ANY property it requires a DEED - and only you the owner can grant that date which has to be compliant with the Law of Property Act (misc Provisions) 1989 and be duly witnessed with an accompanying valid bi-lateral CONTRACT to comply with the Bill of Exchange Act 1882 and be executed in front of you! If none of these things happen, then any 'charge' (alleged) would be put there by fraudulent means and be treated as NULL and VOID and constitute a forgery and so be an indictable offence.
It can be removed by immediately filing a DS-1 form with HMLR and the Property Chamber to remove the false 'charge' on the basis it was procured by deception and in contravention to the Law of Property Act (Misc Provisions) 1989 Section 1, which lawfully requires that any charge is only placed on a property by way of a valid and compliant Deed, and that means the Deed must be granted by you with YOUR consent, duly witnessed and executed in front of you with an accompanying valid Contract! If none of these steps took place, then the Council have committed a serious offence under Section 2,3 & 4 of the Fraud Act 2006 (Fraudulent misrepresentation, Fraud by non-disclosure, Fraud by abuse of position).
KNOW YOUR COMMON LAW RIGHTS !
(Submitted by Elizabeth Watson, Founder of ONE VOICE ACTION GROUP)
The White Rabbit Trust on youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFumn8WqygU
Monday, 20 August 2018
Police being funded for what exactly?
Stories about the police refusing to investigate crimes in areas across the country have been emerging for some time.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/police-victims-failed-confidence-reporting-dangerous-support-criminal-justice-system-a8476811.html
http://www.thewestonmercury.co.uk/news/north-somerset-burglaries-increase-as-police-officer-numbers-fall-1-5630112
Locals in Sheffield were assaulted by 'security' who were protected by police and some were even arrested by police for trying to obstruct the felling of their precious trees
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/security-guard-not-investigated-for-allegedly-punching-sheffield-tree-protester-1-9293451
Some police forces are accepting "gifts" (ie bribes) but are refusing to disclose about them
https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/police-force-refuses-reveal-gift-14978800
And the very serious issue of police assisted evictions and bank repossessions, where police assist bailiffs in what are strictly "Civil Matters". The police are assisting in thousands of illegal evictions of local tax payers, with serious disregard for the law that they are sworn to serve.
https://nearlylegal.co.uk/2010/07/illegal-eviction-and-the-police/
In addition, police are protecting the private & registered companies masquerading as councils as they illegally sell-off Public Assets!
https://thebristolcable.org/2016/04/police-and-private-security-protect-auction-of-council-homes/
If Council Tax funds the police but the police don't serve those that pay them, there is a serious problem for all local habitants and legally a 'Conflict of Interest' and 'Misconduct in Public Office (a serious criminal offence). Each and every habitant who is not served by the police should immediately stop paying councils until local police uphold the Law and serve the local habitants. It's basic common sense!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/police-victims-failed-confidence-reporting-dangerous-support-criminal-justice-system-a8476811.html
http://www.thewestonmercury.co.uk/news/north-somerset-burglaries-increase-as-police-officer-numbers-fall-1-5630112
Locals in Sheffield were assaulted by 'security' who were protected by police and some were even arrested by police for trying to obstruct the felling of their precious trees
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/security-guard-not-investigated-for-allegedly-punching-sheffield-tree-protester-1-9293451
Some police forces are accepting "gifts" (ie bribes) but are refusing to disclose about them
https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/police-force-refuses-reveal-gift-14978800
And the very serious issue of police assisted evictions and bank repossessions, where police assist bailiffs in what are strictly "Civil Matters". The police are assisting in thousands of illegal evictions of local tax payers, with serious disregard for the law that they are sworn to serve.
https://nearlylegal.co.uk/2010/07/illegal-eviction-and-the-police/
In addition, police are protecting the private & registered companies masquerading as councils as they illegally sell-off Public Assets!
https://thebristolcable.org/2016/04/police-and-private-security-protect-auction-of-council-homes/
If Council Tax funds the police but the police don't serve those that pay them, there is a serious problem for all local habitants and legally a 'Conflict of Interest' and 'Misconduct in Public Office (a serious criminal offence). Each and every habitant who is not served by the police should immediately stop paying councils until local police uphold the Law and serve the local habitants. It's basic common sense!
Wednesday, 24 January 2018
Hartlepool council - ANOTHER 'rotten borough'!
The corporate criminals that maladministrate Hartlepool council have the nerve to defend huge "reserves" that have been accumulated from Public Funds. Just like all councils, with their 'Usable' and 'Unusable' Reserves, Hartlepool is desperate to hide its embezzlement and Fraud! The so-called "Public Servants" that run the council are working for private-for-profit companies, companies that take 30% of ALL Council Tax to pay for their copper-bottomed pensions, while they impose the Fraud of "austerity" upon the local habitants.
https://www.hartlepoolmail.co.uk/news/hartlepool-council-defends-52m-reserves-amid-council-tax-rises-1-8955134
When enough people realise the massive Fraud being perpetrated against them, they will probably want to stop paying the unlawful & illegal Council Tax to the local corporate councils that pretend to be 'serving the public'! Support for Fraud is complicity in the Fraud!
https://www.hartlepoolmail.co.uk/news/hartlepool-council-defends-52m-reserves-amid-council-tax-rises-1-8955134
When enough people realise the massive Fraud being perpetrated against them, they will probably want to stop paying the unlawful & illegal Council Tax to the local corporate councils that pretend to be 'serving the public'! Support for Fraud is complicity in the Fraud!
Monday, 15 January 2018
People are being illegally imprisoned for failing to pay council tax
The criminals in the private-for-profit corporate councils are using their illegal "courts", private businesses that they hire for the day, fraudulent "courts" which have no legally-qualified personnel, to falsely and fraudulently imprison the habitants of counties. The private-for-profit corporate "police" are assisting the corporate councils and their 'Third Party Interlopers' in the bailiff and debt collection companies in illegally breaking into homes, damaging property, breaking the Laws that they swore to uphold and enforce.
https://leftfootforward.org/2017/12/over-half-of-council-tax-imprisonments-could-be-against-the-law/
When enough of the habitants of counties realise the HUGE FRAUD and criminality of the corporate councils, how the corporate council criminals are deliberately and maliciously destroying lives and communities for their private profits, that the monies demanded are used for private pensions, huge expense accounts, massive 6-figure incomes of executives, paying off the interest on high-interest private debts to big banks, leading directly to the FRAUD of "austerity", then the rotten system will collapse and have to be re-created by the habitants and for the habitants!
https://leftfootforward.org/2017/12/over-half-of-council-tax-imprisonments-could-be-against-the-law/
When enough of the habitants of counties realise the HUGE FRAUD and criminality of the corporate councils, how the corporate council criminals are deliberately and maliciously destroying lives and communities for their private profits, that the monies demanded are used for private pensions, huge expense accounts, massive 6-figure incomes of executives, paying off the interest on high-interest private debts to big banks, leading directly to the FRAUD of "austerity", then the rotten system will collapse and have to be re-created by the habitants and for the habitants!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)