Concerned about the Phased Array weapons being installed onto traffic lights by the corporate councils in your area and across the UK? Join the Bladerunners and learn how to disabled the weapons safely and legally!
Council Tax is a Scam
Council Tax is a renewable yearly contract, requiring signatures of both parties & full disclosure. There is NO lawful requirement to pay. CT is administered by private-for-profit corporations, primarily for paying their golden pensions & interest on debts! 30% or less goes to public services! Councils hire private courts & issue their own summons. Time to expose the FRAUD & demand a new system!
Saturday, 8 August 2026
The National Bladerunner Tour - how to disable & destroy council Phased Array weapons legally
Council solicitors and other officials acting dishonestly - REPORT THEM!
The disgraceful corporate councils are breaking the rules again. They are often issuing falsified documents.
Yet the rules are clear enough. A PCN must be issued within 7 days. A "Charge Certificate" must be issued within 12 months. The council must reapply before end of 12 months for another 12 Months. There is a maximum time limit of 24 months and that only applies if they have reapplied.
https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part75#IDAGQ0HC
CPR 75.7
" (5) For the purposes of execution a warrant will be valid for 12 months beginning with the date of its issue.
(6) An authority may not renew a warrant issued in accordance with this Part beyond the 12 month validity period but, subject to paragraph (7), an authority may request the reissue of a warrant during the 12 month validity period. "
Council solicitors acting dishonestly can be reported to the Solicitors Regulation Authority and can be sued.
https://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/guidance/general-dishonesty/
The SRA state that the public have a duty to report dishonesty. A solicitor can be struck off. A council solicitor can be banned from Public Office and lose any pensions.
https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/problems/fraud-dishonesty/dishonesty-suspected
Council staff acting dishonestly should be prosecuted for their Misconduct in Public Office and lose their pensions. If they have conspired with others to issue false documents, then the others must be subject to the same discipline.
Thursday, 23 July 2026
Ross v Ashford Borough Council - validity of legal paperwork
"For those who are challenging a petition for bankruptcy, charging order, or an attachment of earnings order for council tax, use the legal precedence of "Ross v Ashford Borough Council" to have the application dismissed by the court.
Ross v Ashford Borough Council is a county court precedent where an individual successfully challenged council tax enforcement proceedings. In this case, the judge dismissed the council's attempt to place a charging order on the resident's home and refused the council permission to appeal.
The primary argument in Ross v Ashford Borough Council centered on the validity of legal paperwork. The court determined that the enforcement chain was legally unsound because the documents (ranging from the liability order to the charging order) were signed off by a paralegal rather than a legally qualified solicitor or a court officer. Because the signatory lacked the required legal authority to compel actions or execute the documents, the entire enforcement case collapsed.
This case is increasingly cited in ongoing council tax and housing disputes across the UK as precedent to challenge enforcement actions. It is often discussed alongside the landmark Mazur case, which examined whether councils have legal standing to pursue certain types of debt enforcement without properly qualified representation."
Saturday, 18 July 2026
£81 BILLION per year lost through FRAUD & ERROR!
£81 BILLION cannot be accounted for.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kvfk79jDA3M
When you pay the corporate councils you are paying criminals who are embezzling billions from the taxes being paid via councils to central government and collected via HMRC.
Allow councils to put up council tax by as much as they want, MPs tell Burnham
"Allow councils to put up council tax by as much as they want, MPs tell Burnham
The cross-party group of MPs says local voters will decide at the ballot box whether councils provide good enough services for what they charge."
As we know, the corporate councils are private-for-profit registered companies. They have no authority and their 'taxes' are illegal. The embezzle literally billions for their copper-bottomed pensions, expenses, wages, brown envelope businesses. When enough people realise the scam that is going on, they will stop paying these corporate criminals.
And it's important to realise that whoever is voted for, the permanent staff of the corporate councils continue to control, to embezzle, to defraud and to ruin lives of the local inhabitants they are sworn to serve. All CFOs are Masonic as are many others in the council staff. They are in conflict of interest and should be made accountable.
Wednesday, 27 May 2026
Somerset County Council - a deeply rotten borough!
A large number of Somerset CC staff & management, plus councillors of all political parties, are directly involved in massive fraud. This is the only way they have been able to sequester millions of pounds of Glastonbury Town Deal funds and escape accountability. As such, the CEO and all management are guilty of Gross Misconduct in Public Office, Embezzlement and Fraud and should be brought to account for their blatant malfeasance. All individuals involved must be fully investigated, then prosecuted with the full force of the law, lose their pensions and be banned from any further Public Office.
https://www.change.org/p/demand-accountability-and-transparency-from-somerset-council
"3.7 Conflict of Interest — PROVEN DOCUMENTED:
• Dr Lynne Sedgmore CBE = Chair of Town Deal Board + Chair of Red Brick Building Centre Ltd — appointed by Somerset Council• Her husband — JOHN CAPPER = Sole Owner / Director of Beckery Construction Ltd — the company paid £2.39M of public money
• Conflict of interest WAS declared in early 2024 documents → DELETED / REMOVED from all later published versions by Somerset Council
• Beckery Construction Ltd is 100% subsidiary of Red Brick Building Centre Ltd — same board controlled both sides of the contract. "
THE £2.2 MILLION CARPET: MANSION VALUE OR CONSULTANCY SINK?
The community is starting to do the math, and the numbers don’t add up.
THE COMPARISON:
As pointed out by local residents, £2.2 Million in the Somerset property market can buy a 26-acre historic manor house. It is a generational asset of immense value.
THE REALITY AT TOR LEISURE:
For that same £2.2 Million of your tax money, what did the Town Deal actually deliver? According to those on the ground, the "major extension" was cancelled, and we got:
- NO Promised Extension
- New Carpets
- An Extended Patio
- A bit of gravel
THE FORENSIC GAP:
If the visible work—the carpets and the patio—costs a tiny fraction of the budget, where is the remaining £2.1 Million?
This is the "Consultancy Sink" in action. While the building is handed over to a failing operator (now in administration), millions of pounds have vanished into "management fees," "reports," and "surveys" that the community never requested and can’t use.
THE STING IN THE TAIL:
It’s not just about the missing millions. While the Council "spent" £2.2m on carpets, they signed over a 125-year lease to a private operator that has now collapsed. If that lease is sold by liquidators to pay off corporate debts, we risk losing the land itself. We paid for the "refurbishment" of a building we might no longer own.
THE GTP DEMAND:
We aren’t just looking for the big numbers anymore. We are looking for the Itemised Invoices. We want to see exactly how much the taxpayer was charged for those carpets and that patio.
The "Not Robust" audit (Page 55) already flagged these failures. The Council cannot say they weren't warned.
The May 12th Deadline is approaching.
Accountability isn't a "timeline puzzle"—it’s a bank statement. ️
The Scrutiny: When you see the £2.2 Million Farmhouse (top), you are looking at hundreds of years of stonework, 15 acres of land, a separate cottage, stables, and a swimming pool. That is what a "generational asset" looks like for that price.
Then you look at the Tor Leisure building (bottom). Even with the most expensive "new carpets and patio," it is impossible to see where £2.2 Million of taxpayer money went.
The Forensic Conclusion:
• The Building: It's an existing structure. No new walls were built, and the extension was cancelled.
• The Math: If the visible work (carpets/paint/patio) cost even £200,000 (which is a generous estimate), there is still £2 MILLION missing.
In the private sector, that £2m buys you the entire estate at the top of your image. In the "Town Deal" world, it apparently vanishes into thin air—or what we call the "Consultancy Sink."
Monday, 16 February 2026
English people live in caravans while illegal immigrants get hotels, benefits, medical & dental care, allowances, etc
ENGLISH TAX PAYERS LIVE IN CARAVANS
NAO Report:
https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/home-offices-asylum-accommodation-contracts.pdf
Tax payers fund £9 Million PER DAY on “Asylum Seekers”
1000’s across the country unable to afford basic necessities like Rent; Gas; Electricity; Water & Council Tax, are forced to live in caravans.
Brighton and Hove Councils answer is to “Speak to the Legal Team and Take Enforcement Action” https://news.sky.com/story/the-van-dwellers-left-with-no-option-but-to-live-on-the-kerb-13506759
A similar story is happening in Glastonbury
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RG2Z-eZQPA
Interesting 'coincidence' that both Brighton and Glastonbury councils are controlled by the Green Party. The 'greens' like 'gentrification', spending millions on "Net Zero" and Low Traffic Neighbourhood plans, or consulting on the Glastonbury World Heritage Site agenda.
In Glastonbury the famous "Town Deal" secured £23.6 million which included £2 million allocation for a caravan/van dwelling non-bricks & mortar park-up. The council bought some flood land at a premium rate and then discovered it was unsuitable for parking or electrics so scrapped the scheme and sold the land at a loss. Then they set about driving away the van & caravan dwellers, destroying the existing community of artistic and creative people all operating sustainable work. They aggressively forced out anyone that resisted. They also implemented a scheme for a mock 'roundhouse' visitor centre to the famous Bridie's Mound site and damaged the land and archeological site by constructing a grey stone chip road that extended over the Mound itself. The councils like spending money when it suits them!
Official statistics showed a record 131,140 households in temporary accommodation in England.
While the Home Office spends £145 per night to put an individual in a hotel, many local councils are struggling to find the budget to keep their own residents off the streets.
When the local inhabitants of the area discover the degree of corruption in their corporate councils, they will probably want to stop paying them!




