The criminals running Corporate Councils are selling OUR Public assets to pay for THEIR fraud!

This has been going on for years - unelected & corrupted corporate council staff and management, selling off Publicly owned assets to compensate and cover for their massive fraud & embezzlement! Every single one of them is complicit in the Fraud and is guilty of Misconduct in Public Office. Every single one should be removed from office, fully investigated, prosecuted, asset-stripped, and in many cases jailed for maximum terms. All monies recovered to be returned to the local council funds to be administered by local people of proven integrity.

The warnings have been in plain sight:

https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2019-03-04/sold-from-under-you

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68439624

https://inews.co.uk/news/tax-hiking-councils-forced-sell-property-worth-billions-2931141

https://www.newstatesman.com/spotlight/economic-growth/regional-development/2024/01/selling-assets-council-bankruptcies-local-government-funding

https://www.localgov.co.uk/Councils-sell-off-4000-public-buildings-a-year-FOI-requests-reveal/45500

https://www.localgov.co.uk/Town-halls-forced-to-sell-community-assets-as-debts-mount/62920

From AI:
"The Local Government Association (LGA) strongly opposes the use of council asset sales to fund day-to-day services, arguing that such measures are not a substitute for long-term funding solutions.  The LGA emphasizes that capital receipts and borrowing are not "free money," can only be spent once, and cannot address ongoing revenue pressures or structural deficits.   
While the UK government has granted flexibility to cash-strapped councils to sell assets like property and land to balance their books, the LGA warns this approach: 
- Fails to solve systemic issues: Asset sales offer only a one-off cash injection that does not resolve the underlying lack of adequate central government funding for local services. 
- Endangers community resources: Selling public assets, including libraries, pools, and parks, extracts wealth and power from communities, often benefiting private developers rather than local needs.
- Risks irreversible loss: Many assets are sold to the highest bidder, permanently removing vital community infrastructure and spaces from public control.
The LGA maintains that councils are best placed to decide what works for their communities and urges the government to address the root causes of local government financial crises rather than encouraging the sell-off of public assets."

From Madeleine Hunt at National Residents for Civic Accountability

Dear team,
The Local Government Association has just openly admitted in the executive press exactly what we have been warning about: councils are speeding to sell off local assets and land just to cover their day-to-day bankruptcy. They are liquidating our land, wildlife, heritage, parks, fields, woodlands to plug the massive financial black holes created by spending public money on restructuring into this wider globalist agenda. They aren't even hiding it any more they are selling the ground from under us to fund their ill-minded agenda.

Because of this panic, every village, town, and borough right now has a group of desperate residents objecting to mass developments, building use conversions, solar farms, and land grabs. But we have very narrow time window to block them

But there is a massive problem: these local groups of ordinary citizens do not understand how the local government engine actually works. They are being pulled down the usual route to nowhere, exhausting their communities by fundraising for mainstream planning lawyers and establishment NGOs. This industry will simply drain their cash, offer them false hope, and ultimately manage them into quiet resignation. Hardly anyone realises that councils are adopting Regulation 19 right now, and once they do, it allows planning applications to be approved almost automatically. All these local campaigns are fighting in good faith, but without knowing this, their efforts are being quietly neutralised. People are investing time and energy into battles that are structurally set up to fail - often guided by advisers who don’t understand the statutory process or those who do understand and deliberately using their knowledge to fulfil their mission.

We need to reach these groups and bring them into the real fight. Right now. Burnham will be announcing his budget on 28 September - and the entire “budget” depends on selling off public assets and raising taxes.

Jerry is now officially leading an NRCA national operation to identify, connect with, and redirect these local campaigners. We need to reach these groups before they spend their money or lose momentum, and show them how to use the statutory and financial mechanisms that actually freeze council agendas.

The goal is to connect all these small, isolated campaigns into one national challenge.

I sent a formal NRCA warning to Rayner two days ago, following my previous formal letter on the same developments and immigration issues — after which she and McMahon disappeared from their seats. Now they’re back, and the issue is back with them. There’s no escape from the evidence.

Here is what you need to do today:
Scout your local areas, community social media pages, and regional papers for any group fighting a planning or development issue, asset disposal, or conversion.

Send the details of those campaigns directly to Jerry at jerrshaw@pm.me.

If you already know the specific names of the people leading these local campaigns, include them immediately, that is the most valuable input you can provide for our strategic actions right now.

Do not let your local objectors being placed on the hamster wheel by a legal system and media designed to exhaust and defeat them. Find them, send the details to Jerry, and let's arm them with the tools that actually work.

Thank you!!

What Is Really Happening Inside Local Councils:

https://docmalik.substack.com/p/443-madeleine-hunt-what-is-really
The infiltrated and corrupted Reform UK political party are actively undermining the work of the NRCA!

Madeleine Hunt and Rachel Mathews: The Illusion of Democracy: Local Government Reorganisation Exposed:

https://docmalik.substack.com/p/499-madeleine-hunt-and-rachel-mathews
Manufactured Crises: How Councils Use Fake Emergencies to Seize Control and What You Can Do About It

SUPPORT THE NRCA LEGAL DEFENCE FUND — STAND WITH US

This is how we win — not protests, but court‑ready, resident‑led legal action backed by evidence.

WHO THEY ARE: National Residents for Civic Accountability — non‑partisan, independent, built on transparency, fiduciary duty, and public trust.

WHAT THEY PROVE: Official audits show 99% of councils fail assurance; £1.1T spending unchecked; Parliament warns reorganisation hides corruption.

WHERE YOUR MONEY GOES: Held in a ring‑fenced community account — strictly for judicial review, legal advice, court costs, and challenging unlawful mergers/secrecy. No salaries, no overhead — pure action.

HOW TO PLEDGE SAFELY:

1. Full NRCA report & pledge page:

https://sites.google.com/view/nationalresidentscivicaffairs/resident-led-judicial-review-fund-governance-audit-and-consent

2. Or direct bank transfer (secure):

• Account Name: Residents Legal Defence Fund

• Sort Code: 23‑05‑80

• Account No: 57489588

• Reference: Justice

Every penny protects our rights, holds officials personally liable, and builds the blueprint every county can follow.

A petition for Somerset inhabitants:

https://www.change.org/p/demand-accountability-and-transparency-from-somerset-council

The National Bladerunner Tour - how to disable & destroy council Phased Array weapons legally

Concerned about the Phased Array weapons being installed onto traffic lights by the corporate councils in your area and across the UK? Join the Bladerunners and learn how to disabled the weapons safely and legally!

Become A Blade Runner talks in the UK we are now taking bookings 

September National tour 2026

Host us in your city or town 

Get in early 

Donations to cover our costs, minimum 20 - 150 people for the live talks

A hall or a stand in the park for the venue 

Book us now for your area 

What you need to know

How to submit the Evidence 

How to stop the unlawful 15 minute city prison camp with direct action 

How to educate the public 

How to deal with the police 

Location, England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales 

               Apply to join our on the road convoy, drive with us as we travel from city to town in the UK, or join the team

Must have projector, mic, sound system 

90-min talk + 30 min Q&A

Email: bladerunnertalks@keemail.me

Click on this link to Apply

http://Tinyurl.com/bladerunnertalks

Share this information on all your local stand in the park groups 

Email your friends

The Totnes event recordings:
Part 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35qHivTNEuc

Part 2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hkUI3kvbjY

Council solicitors and other officials acting dishonestly - REPORT THEM!

The disgraceful corporate councils are breaking the rules again. They are often issuing falsified documents.
Yet the rules are clear enough. A PCN  must be issued within 7 days. A "Charge Certificate" must be issued within 12 months. The council must reapply before end of 12 months for another 12 Months. There is a maximum time limit of 24 months and that only applies if they have reapplied.

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part75#IDAGQ0HC

CPR 75.7 

" (5) For the purposes of execution a warrant will be valid for 12 months beginning with the date of its issue.

(6) An authority may not renew a warrant issued in accordance with this Part beyond the 12 month validity period but, subject to paragraph (7), an authority may request the reissue of a warrant during the 12 month validity period. "

Council solicitors acting dishonestly can be reported to the Solicitors Regulation Authority and can be sued.
https://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/guidance/general-dishonesty/

The SRA state that the public have a duty to report dishonesty. A solicitor can be struck off. A council solicitor can be banned from Public Office and lose any pensions.
https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/problems/fraud-dishonesty/dishonesty-suspected

Council staff acting dishonestly should be prosecuted for their Misconduct in Public Office and lose their pensions. If they have conspired with others to issue false documents, then the others must be subject to the same discipline.

Ross v Ashford Borough Council - validity of legal paperwork

"For those who are challenging a petition for bankruptcy, charging order, or an attachment of earnings order for council tax, use the legal precedence of "Ross v Ashford Borough Council" to have the application dismissed by the court.

Ross v Ashford Borough Council is a county court precedent where an individual successfully challenged council tax enforcement proceedings. In this case, the judge dismissed the council's attempt to place a charging order on the resident's home and refused the council permission to appeal.

The primary argument in Ross v Ashford Borough Council centered on the validity of legal paperwork. The court determined that the enforcement chain was legally unsound because the documents (ranging from the liability order to the charging order) were signed off by a paralegal rather than a legally qualified solicitor or a court officer. Because the signatory lacked the required legal authority to compel actions or execute the documents, the entire enforcement case collapsed.

This case is increasingly cited in ongoing council tax and housing disputes across the UK as precedent to challenge enforcement actions. It is often discussed alongside the landmark Mazur case, which examined whether councils have legal standing to pursue certain types of debt enforcement without properly qualified representation."

https://www.peaceofficers.uk/ross-v-ashford-borough-council-a-council-tax-enforcement-case-worth-understanding/

£81 BILLION per year lost through FRAUD & ERROR!

£81 BILLION cannot be accounted for. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kvfk79jDA3M

When you pay the corporate councils you are paying criminals who are embezzling billions from the taxes being paid via councils to central government and collected via HMRC.

Allow councils to put up council tax by as much as they want, MPs tell Burnham

"Allow councils to put up council tax by as much as they want, MPs tell Burnham

The cross-party group of MPs says local voters will decide at the ballot box whether councils provide good enough services for what they charge."

https://news.sky.com/story/allow-councils-to-put-up-council-tax-by-as-much-as-they-want-mps-tell-burnham-13563208

As we know, the corporate councils are private-for-profit registered companies. They have no authority and their 'taxes' are illegal. The embezzle literally billions for their copper-bottomed pensions, expenses, wages, brown envelope businesses. When enough people realise the scam that is going on, they will stop paying these corporate criminals.
And it's important to realise that whoever is voted for, the permanent staff of the corporate councils continue to control, to embezzle, to defraud and to ruin lives of the local inhabitants they are sworn to serve. All CFOs are Masonic as are many others in the council staff. They are in conflict of interest and should be made accountable.

Somerset County Council - a deeply rotten borough!

 A large number of Somerset CC staff & management, plus councillors of all political parties, are directly involved in massive fraud. This is the only way they have been able to sequester millions of pounds of Glastonbury Town Deal funds and escape accountability. As such, the CEO and all management are guilty of Gross Misconduct in Public Office, Embezzlement and Fraud and should be brought to account for their blatant malfeasance. All individuals involved must be fully investigated, then prosecuted with the full force of the law, lose their pensions and be banned from any further Public Office.

https://www.change.org/p/demand-accountability-and-transparency-from-somerset-council

"3.7 Conflict of Interest — PROVEN DOCUMENTED:

• Dr Lynne Sedgmore CBE = Chair of Town Deal Board + Chair of Red Brick Building Centre Ltd — appointed by Somerset Council
• Her husband — JOHN CAPPER = Sole Owner / Director of Beckery Construction Ltd — the company paid £2.39M of public money
• Conflict of interest WAS declared in early 2024 documents → DELETED / REMOVED from all later published versions by Somerset Council
• Beckery Construction Ltd is 100% subsidiary of Red Brick Building Centre Ltd — same board controlled both sides of the contract. "

The scandals include the misspending & fraud at Tor Leisure:

THE £2.2 MILLION CARPET: MANSION VALUE OR CONSULTANCY SINK? 

The community is starting to do the math, and the numbers don’t add up.

THE COMPARISON:

As pointed out by local residents, £2.2 Million in the Somerset property market can buy a 26-acre historic manor house. It is a generational asset of immense value.

THE REALITY AT TOR LEISURE:

For that same £2.2 Million of your tax money, what did the Town Deal actually deliver? According to those on the ground, the "major extension" was cancelled, and we got:

- NO Promised Extension

- New Carpets

- An Extended Patio

- A bit of gravel

THE FORENSIC GAP:

If the visible work—the carpets and the patio—costs a tiny fraction of the budget, where is the remaining £2.1 Million?

This is the "Consultancy Sink" in action. While the building is handed over to a failing operator (now in administration), millions of pounds have vanished into "management fees," "reports," and "surveys" that the community never requested and can’t use.

THE STING IN THE TAIL:

It’s not just about the missing millions. While the Council "spent" £2.2m on carpets, they signed over a 125-year lease to a private operator that has now collapsed. If that lease is sold by liquidators to pay off corporate debts, we risk losing the land itself. We paid for the "refurbishment" of a building we might no longer own.

THE GTP DEMAND:

We aren’t just looking for the big numbers anymore. We are looking for the Itemised Invoices. We want to see exactly how much the taxpayer was charged for those carpets and that patio.

The "Not Robust" audit (Page 55) already flagged these failures. The Council cannot say they weren't warned.

The May 12th Deadline is approaching.

Accountability isn't a "timeline puzzle"—it’s a bank statement. ️

The Scrutiny: When you see the £2.2 Million Farmhouse (top), you are looking at hundreds of years of stonework, 15 acres of land, a separate cottage, stables, and a swimming pool. That is what a "generational asset" looks like for that price.

Then you look at the Tor Leisure building (bottom). Even with the most expensive "new carpets and patio," it is impossible to see where £2.2 Million of taxpayer money went.

The Forensic Conclusion:

• The Building: It's an existing structure. No new walls were built, and the extension was cancelled.

• The Math: If the visible work (carpets/paint/patio) cost even £200,000 (which is a generous estimate), there is still £2 MILLION missing.

In the private sector, that £2m buys you the entire estate at the top of your image. In the "Town Deal" world, it apparently vanishes into thin air—or what we call the "Consultancy Sink."