Islington Council - a disgrace!

Islington Council, home to millionaire Labour Luvvies, including plenty of War Criminal Tony Blair supporters, has now banned an Israeli because he was accused by non-Israelis of being "antisemitic"! You could NOT make this nonsense up!

https://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/council-bans-gilad-atzmon-from-performing-with-the-blockheads/

For clarity's sake, here is the definition of "Semite", which makes it very clear that Arabic speakers are Semitic, Ethiopians are Semitic, as well as many other groups including Aramaic & Hebrew speakers. 
"A member of any of the peoples speaking a Semitic language, including the Arabs, Arameans, Babylonians, Carthaginians, Hebrews, Phoenicians, and many of the peoples of Ethiopia."
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/Semite
So when a non-Israeli attacks or discriminates against Arabic or Ethiopian speakers they are being "antisemitic" by definition!

Decent people in Islington should stop paying any Council Tax to the disgraceful and discriminatory workers in the corporate council!

Sedgemoor District Council - ANOTHER 'rotten borough'!

The news is in - Sedgemoor's council staff and councillors have voted themselves even more money while imposing cuts and "austerity" upon the people that they are sworn to serve.
"Sedgemoor District Council's Executive members voted through their own pay rise earlier this week, while simultaneously presiding over £150,000 in staff cuts."
As a result the locals are waking up and preparing to expose the corruption in Somerset..

https://www.somersetlive.co.uk/news/somerset-news/time-fight-back-yellow-vest-2323907

Now is the time for ALL locals to STOP paying Council Tax and Business Rates and force the corrupt corporate council to sack its executives and use their wages to provide vital services!

Dartford Borough Council - a CRIMINAL council!

Dartford Borough Council is a private company registered at 5 different separate company addresses:
https://companycheck.co.uk/search?term=Dartford+Borough+Council
They are claiming the Legal right to issue arrest warrants, liability orders, and even commit local habitants to prison for what is strictly a "Civil Matter".

According to the Law of England, both in Statute and in Common Law, no freeman shall be imprisoned without a trial by a jury:
Statute:
"XXIX Imprisonment, &c. contrary to Law. Administration of Justice.
NO Freeman shall be taken or imprisoned, or be disseised of his Freehold, or Liberties, or free Customs, or be outlawed, or exiled, or any other wise destroyed; nor will We not pass upon him, nor [X1condemn him,] but by lawful judgment of his Peers, or by the Law of the Land. We will sell to no man, we will not deny or defer to any man either Justice or Right. "
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1cc1929/25/9/section/XXIX
Common Law, Magna Carta 1215:
"39. Nullus liber homo capiatur, vel imprisonetur, aut disseisiatur, aut utlagetur, aut exuletur, aut aliquo modo destruatur, nec super cum ibimus, nec super cum mittemus, nisi per legale judicium parium suorum vel per legem terre.
40. Nulli vendemus, nulli negabimus aut differemus rectum aut justiciam." "39. No freeman shall be arrested or imprisoned or disseised or outlawed or exiled or in any other way harmed. Nor will we [the king] proceed against him, or send others to do so, except according to the lawful sentence of his peers and according to the law of the land.
40. To no one will we sell, to no one will we refuse or delay, right or justice."

By breaking both Statute and Common Law, "Dartford Borough Council", including its staff, executives, and all officers, is committing several serious Criminal offences and all those responsible should be arrested, prosecuted in a properly convened court of Law, and imprisoned for their Crimes. Their Crimes include Misconduct in Public Office, Fraud (by definition according to the Fraud Act 2006), Misappropriation of Public Funds, and Treason.
According to the CPS:
"Prosecutors should guard against the criminal law being used as a debt collection agency or to protect the commercial interests of companies and organisations. However, prosecutors should also remain alert to the fact that such organisations can become the focus of serious and organised criminal offending."
https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/fraud-act-2006

The habitants of Dartford and all other council areas where the corporate councils are issuing fraudulent warrants and other orders and impersonating judges and juries, may wish to stop paying any Council Tax to fund this Criminal activity!

Time to ask questions!

All the private corporate councils are embezzling Public Funds, but some are using more force to steal money from the "residents" than others. They have no Law behind them because they are private companies and subject to contract laws to 'provide a service' and receive payment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEtO53i5HWA

Time to ask questions of local councils and establish the facts! When people discover that councils are committing fraud and Misconduct in Public Office, then any support for them must be withdrawn!

The dodgy Fracking councils

The 'revelations' about council pension funds heavily invested in the Fracking industries should come as no surprise to many who have followed the blatant fraud and dodgy investments of the corporate councils. When the council pension funds were found to be heavily invested in illegal weapons manufacture (such as cluster munitions and white phosphorus) it became obvious that many of the entirely corporate (therefore private & for profit) councils were guilty of Misappropriation of Public Funds and Misconduct in Public Office by definition in Law, and should not be supported at all. This gave further impetus & incentive to withdraw any further form of consent (ie registrations & payment of local rates & taxes) to the flagrant breaches of trust that were/are being perpetrated against local habitants of counties. For locals to discover that those who channel funding to abusive 'policing', to protection of Fracking companies are the same corporate groups that invest in arms, that steal children and homes from families, that neglect roads, that sell-off Public Assets, that reward themselves with vast secure & private pensions, that reward themselves with often 6 figure pay levels and massive redundancy packages, that have borrowed vast sums privately using their registered locals as 'securities' for the high interest debts, that hold massive "Unusable Reserve" accounts that were created using millions of pounds of Public Funds (in many cases more than enough to offset all alleged debt), has obviously changed the ways in which large numbers view the local corporate 'leaders' and their lackeys!

https://drillordrop.com/2018/09/03/uk-councils-invest-9bn-of-pension-funds-in-fracking-companies-new-research/

The habitants of Greater Manchester should be particularly concerned, as should be their neighbours in (bankrupt) Lancashire. GMC is the largest council investor in Fracking, while they send their particularly nasty corporate 'police' to abuse, assault, arrest, harass and intimidate legitimate peaceful protest by people wanting to protect their land and water:

http://salfordstar.com/article.asp?id=4692

The truth will not go away. ANY councils that have pension funds invested in Fracking are in direct Conflict of Interest. They are frauds and criminals, guilty of Misappropriation of Public Funds whilst imposing the fraud of "austerity" upon the people that pay them. When enough people realise the huge con of the corporate councils, they will want to force divestment from arms and fracking industries, to force the corporate councils to reveal the amounts of Public Funds held in longterm & secretive investments, to force the corporate councils to sack (without pension) the criminals that drove whole counties into private debt & paid themselves huge sums for doing so! They may wish to STOP paying any further Council Taxes or rates to force the corrupted councils to do their jobs and serve the people!

Some good advice about alleged 'debt'

For those unaware of how debt works here's a quick summary.

1) You 'contract' with a company or you don't if its a Government body. Either way you are expected to pay.You can dispute this at any time by asking for the contractual agreement signed by you to prove liability. It's likely they will just ignore the request and push you straight to a third party debt collection agency.

2) A liability order is considered to be genuine if it contains the 'original amount of the debt' without charges and also has absolutely no branding of the debt collection agency. If it has extra charges then consider it to be fake and if its on their own headed paper also consider it to be fake.

3) Most companies have the ability to write off outstanding debt and they do this by selling it off to a third party enforcement company. From that point the debt is no longer owed by you in lawful terms and now it is up to the third party to recover the debt.

Now some people slip up here as they do not understand that these accumulated debts are sold off to the third party at a fraction of the price so a £5000 debt may be sold for less than 1/5th of the amount however they are still expecting £5000+ from you. This is one of the reasons the process of adding fees and their individual amounts is nothing more than extortion.

4) These third party debt collectors have very little power in terms of the law and so in order to retrieve the debt they have to 'strong arm' and you see this with various letters increasing in forceful language. They certainly cannot enlist the assistance of the Publicly Funded Law Enforcement to force entry or payment from you. In order to even reach this stage they would need to apply for a liability order which under normal circumstances would be rejected as these are Civil Matters yet they are applied for in Criminal Circumstances.

5) If they try to bullshit you with a liability order and the Police to assist then inform the Police they are only to be used for Civil matters and not as 'muscle for hire' for Private Companies. Then inform the debt collector you wish to see the original Liability order and not one just stamped and not signed. They won't have it because no judge would sign their name to what is not regarded as a criminal offence.

So simply put third party debt collectors are very much like traders. They buy low and try to recoup the full amount with the additional fees as a 'bonus' but once they buy the debt they are the ones liable and not you!:

Negotiation in this situation can be a great tactic because you could bring down the existing debt, if you owe one, substantially however in order to do that you are accepting liability so remember that when making your move 

Council Tax suggestions from Daniel Bostock

Some Council Tax suggestions from Daniel Bostock
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JstaIKCueyc


A useful anti-terrorism Council Tax template for adaptation:

Your name xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your address xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2018
Name from letter or council name xxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ref xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your Letter dated xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For the attention of the Council 151 officer 
Dear Sir/Madam. 
Application for discount under Section 13a of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 
It has come to my attention that the Council is involved in the funding of Terrorists. I would like the 151 officer to investigate my complaint and file a report. This matter should also be treated as an application for discount under Section 13a of the Local Government Finance Act 1992. It would be a serious breach of Council procedure to ignore my application. The application is for a reduction to ZERO. Any enforcement action should be stopped while this application is being processed. I have recently come into information that indicates that the Council is funding acts of terrorism which is a breach of Article 3 Section 15 of the Terrorism Act 2000. Some of the evidence I have come across indicates that: 
On the 7th July 2005 Terrorist attacks were carried out, in London, by MI5 with the assistance of Mossad. UK Police were involved in the subsequent cover up of these attacks. https://youtu.be/kwyzpzEgUWE

The shooting to death of unarmed Anthony Grainger in 2012 by Greater Manchester Police. This being one of 1518 people killed by police contact since 2005http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2315777/The-memory-stick-killing-When-police-lost-data-card-names-1-000-informants-questioned-father--cleared-Two-months-later-shot-dead.html... 
The assault on peaceful protesters by multiple UK Police forces in support of Cuadrilla and Third Energy Corporations attempting to poison the water Aquifers using Hydraulic Fracturing in Lancashire and Yorkshire. 
https://drillordrop.com/.../lancashire-police-face.../
The Conviction of the UK government in the international War Crime commission for the illegal invasion of IRAQ killing an estimated 1 million men women and children. https://www.aljazeera.com/.../11/20111128105712109215.html

The support of the UK government for the Genocide being carried out in GAZA. The murder of men women and children using Tax collected by the UK Government. https://electronicintifada.net/content/genocide-gaza/6397

Council Tax is funding acts of Terrorism using outlawed Cluster-bombs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Uj72JNfFUg

I put you on notice that I am withholding payment of Council Tax until such time as the Council can demonstrate to me that they are no longer funding acts of Terrorism. 

Furthermore:
The local Government Finance Act 1992 and/or the Council Tax Admin & Enforcement regulation 1992 are non-applicable in this matter. When a service is provided by an organisation, be it a council or other, they have to act within the Law, contract Law in this case. You also cannot ignore Constitutional Law, or repeal it.

There is no contract with yourself and myself xxxyourxnamexxxxx. The terms of an agreement must be sufficiently certain or the agreement will be void for uncertainty. Where a contract is void it is automatically of no effect from the very beginning.

I, nor a council, can suggest they can ignore the Law with no consequence, and act in an illegal manner to obtain finances through menaces. Thus getting a secondary company involved is creating something that is, unlawful and illegal in its actions. We should remember that you are civil servants who serve the public, not the other way around.

A‘void’ order or claim has no legal effect ab initio (from the beginning/outset) and therefore does not need to be appealed, although for convenience it may sometimes be necessary to have it set aside (Lord Denning in MacFoy v United Africa Co. Ltd. [1961] and Firman v Ellis [1978]) whereas a ‘voidable’ order or claim has legal effect unless and until it is set aside. Therefore, while a void order or claim does not have to be obeyed and can be ignored and its nullity can be relied on as a defence when necessary (Wandsworth London Borough Council v. Winder [1985] A.C. 461), a voidable order or claim has to be obeyed and cannot be ignored unless and until it is set aside. In Bellinger v Bellinger [2003] UKHL 21 the House of Lords confirmed that a void act is void from the outset and no Court – not even the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) - has jurisdiction to give legal effect to a void act no matter how unreasonable that may seem, because doing so would mean reforming the law which no Court has power to do because such power rests only with Parliament. The duty of the Court is to interpret and apply the law not reform or create it.

Obviously I have a legal claim on you (the council) not the company you’ve fraudulently used to demand money through menaces. So we seek address from the civil service as, quite wrongly, you've acted in an illegal manner.

So currently acting unlawfully. Fraud in Fact by Deceit Obfuscation and Denial and Theft “ACTUAL FRAUD. Creating a deception and concealing something or making a false representation, causing mental injury to an individual.

Acting outside of the Law and demanding money through menaces. The Criminal Justice (Public Order) Act, 1994 clearly states; It shall be an offence for any person who, with a view to gain for himself or another or with intent to cause loss to another, makes any unwarranted demand with menaces.

(2) For the purposes of this section—

(a) a demand with menaces shall be unwarranted unless the person making it does so in the belief—

(i) that he has reasonable grounds for making the demand, and

(ii) that the use of the menaces is a proper means of reinforcing the demand;

(b) the nature of the act or omission demanded shall be immaterial and it shall also be immaterial whether or not the menaces relate to action to be taken by the person making the demand.

(3) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable—

(a) on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding £1,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both,

(b) on conviction on indictment to a fine or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years or to both.

I Your namexxxxxxxxxxxxxxxb will also point out that any future liabilities will be paid by the council on my behalf in accordance with the Local Govt Act 1888 c41 part V proceedings of a council and committee section 79 subsection 2.

Yours Sincerely,
Signaturexxxxxxxxxx
Namexxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx